Talent Risk

Talent Risk · Employers · Pharma & healthcare

Pharmaceutical Product Development

Contract research organization·Pharma & healthcare·HQ US

SignsConfirmed, but small: every notice under 100 jobs and under 0.1% of staff in 90 days · since 28th September 2026
Updated 9th November 202626 weeks
69
Jobs cut · 90 days and 12 months
28th Sep 2026
Latest on record

Pharmaceutical Product Development is showing signs of job cuts: 69 jobs in small notices in the last 90 days, below the size that counts as Cutting.

Latest, on 28th September: PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific filed a WARN notice for a layoff affecting 69 employees at Middleton, WI, effective 2026-09-28.

How to read this page
  • The label (Cutting, Signs or Quiet) comes from one published rule applied to the sources listed: the company, formal notices and named outlets. The rule
  • The figures count each announcement once. Where a figure is left out, the record says why (one report only, offered not cut, same round).
  • Summary says what is happening and what would change the label; Full record lists every report, linked.

What’s happening, and where

  • 28th September 2026Cuts announced · 69 jobs in Middleton, WIPPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific filed a WARN notice for a layoff affecting 69 employees at Middleton, WI, effective 2026-09-28.Formal notice · WARN notice (WI)

Next This becomes Cutting if a single notice or announcement in 90 days covers 100 or more jobs, or 0.1% of its staff.

The last 12 months

DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSeptOctNov28th Sep 2026: PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific filed a WARN notice for a layoff affecting 69 employees at Middleton, WI, effective 2026-09-28.69
CutsBuyouts, plans and signsHiringBigger mark = more jobs named

Not enough history to compare. We have under a year of history for this employer, so there is nothing of its own to compare this with yet.

This label is our opinion, reached by applying one published rule to the sources listed. Pharmaceutical Product Development can correct the record at any time.

At a glance

LabelSigns since the week to 28th Sep
Jobs cut, 90 days and 12 months69 · workforce not on our record, so no share
Latest on the record28th September 2026 · Cuts announced · 69 jobs
Where the jobs areMiddleton, WI · US
Jobs we countAll 69 jobs reported. How we count
Normal for them?Not enough history to compare. We have under a year of history for this employer, so there is nothing of its own to compare this with yet.
Sources, 12 months1 formal notice, each linked below
Headquarters · sectorUS · Pharma & healthcare · PPD

Identifiers Wikidata Q7180736 · PPD on Nasdaq · About these

What happened

Every event on the record, newest first. Each has its own page; open a row’s reports to see every source. How we decide

  1. 28th Sep
    Pharmaceutical Product Development files a WARN notice for 69 jobs in Wisconsin

    Cuts announcedWisconsinFormal notice

    PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific filed a WARN notice for a layoff affecting 69 employees at Middleton, WI, effective 2026-09-28.

    The source: WARN notice (WI)
    1. 28th Sep

      WARN notice (WI) Official

      PPD d/b/a Thermo Fisher Scientific filed a WARN notice for a layoff affecting 69 employees at Middleton, WI, effective 2026-09-28.

    Its own page, with the facts →

    69jobs cut

In context

How the label has changed · 26 weeks

28th SepQuiet → Signs · Confirmed, but small: every notice under 100 jobs and under 0.1% of staff in 90 days

Share of its sector’s cuts

3%

of the 2,352 job cuts announced in 12 months by the employers we rate in pharma & healthcare.

Peers in pharma & healthcare

  1. GSK1.8%
  2. Novartis1.1%
  3. Novo Nordisk0.1%
  4. Johnson & Johnson<0.1%
  5. Pharmaceutical Product Development69 jobs

Job cuts in 12 months as a share of each employer’s workforce. Pharmaceutical Product Development’s workforce is not on our record, so it is shown by jobs, unranked.

Use this record RSS · JSON · Embed ·

Right of reply

Pharmaceutical Product Development can reply or correct this record at any time.

Correct the record →

This label is our opinion, reached by applying one published rule to the sources listed.